Description

The book review is a short genre that typically summarizes and then evaluates a recently published book (Belcher, 2019). The summary portion follows the key principles of summary: to extract the most important points from the original book by paraphrasing its contents. In general, authors of book reviews avoid using many quotations, with a few carefully chosen exceptions. The evaluation or critique portion of a book review provides the writer’s opinion based on particular criteria or perspectives (Nicolaisen, 2002), which may relate to the stated or implicit aims of the book. One of the grounds to evaluate a book may be whether its author(s) have accomplished the aims they articulate in the book.

As an example of the combination of summary and critique, the reviewer of a book in the field of anthropology,Returned: Going and coming in an age of deportation (Boehm, 2016), a reviewer, Sarabia (2018) summarizes the book as primarily describing the consequences of the deportation of undocumented immigrants from the United States. She then critiques that Boehm’s book did not systematically organize the stories of the deported families and undertheorized some terms: “Boehm talks about ‘disappearances’ in Chapter Three, but not all deported migrants are disappeared. To use such language, in the context of Latin America, it must be theorized and contextualized” (p. 305).

Variations and Tensions

The length of a book review depends on the journal in which it will be published. For example, the Scandinavian Journal of Management publishes book reviews of 1,400-1,800 words (Scandinavian Journal of Management, n.d.).

Book reviews may be commissioned by a journal’s book reviews editor, who invites certain scholars to write reviews. For example, the website of the journal Artificial Intelligence explains, “The review editors solicit reviews from researchers assessed to be expert in the field of the book” (Artificial Intelligence, n.d., p. 2). Other journals accept unsolicited reviews proposed or submitted by potential reviewers. Some journals and disciplinary listservs publicize a list of books available for review.

Writing book reviews can be a way for graduate students to get experience with academic publishing because it take less time to write and publish reviews than articles (Hyland & Diani, 2009). However, student writers may find it difficult to evaluate a book if they are not deeply familiar with the field or are concerned about the power relations involved in critiquing senior scholars (Belcher, 2019).

Graduate Student Voice

One challenge in writing my first book review was to discuss the book’s contributions to the knowledge base. To do so, I had to increase my knowledge of the field. – Ting Zhang

Reflection Questions

1. Do journals in your discipline publish book reviews? If so, have you found any of them useful?
2. Locate a few book reviews in academic journals or popular magazines or and identify where the author(s) of the review uses both summary and critique.

For Further Reading

Belcher, W. (n.d.). How to write an academic book review.  https://wendybelcher.com/writing-advice/how-to-write-book-review.This website introduces the steps of writing a book review, from choosing a book to making a plan to drafting the text.

Nicolaisen, J. (2002). The scholarliness of published peer reviews: A bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields. Research Evaluation, 11(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776808. This article describes the common rhetorical moves of the book review in social sciences.

References

Artificial Intelligence. (n.d.). Author information pack. https://www.elsevier.com/journals/artificial-intelligence/0004-3702/guide-for-authors

Belcher, W. L. (2019). Writing your journal article in twelve weeks: A guide to academic publishing success (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Boehm, D. A. (2016). Returned: Going and coming in an age of deportation. University of California Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.1525/j.ctt1bd6k3g

Hyland, K., & Diani, G. (2009). Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres. In K. Hyland & G. Diani (Eds.), Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings. (pp. 1–14). Palgrave Macmillan.

Nicolaisen, J. (2002). The scholarliness of published peer reviews: A bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields. Research Evaluation, 11(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776808

Sarabia, H. (2018). [Review of the book Returned: Going and coming in an age of deportation, by D. A., Boehm]. Contemporary Sociology, 47(3), 304–306. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0094306118767651h

Scandinavian Journal of Management. (n.d.). Instructions for research notes and book reviews.https://www.journals.elsevier.com/scandinavian-journal-of-management/policies/instructions-for-research-notes-and-book-reviews

Please leave feedback on the Book Review entry here.