Chasing a Ghost: Steve Bartman and the Cubs

bartman-master1050The date was October 14, 2003. The Chicago Cubs we finally having a decent season, keeping a good record all the way until game 6 of the National League Championship Series. Many Chicagoan were beyond excited for the remaining games of the series, the whole city had a euphoric atmosphere. People would gather at the local sports bars and hug strangers when their cubbies scored. So far, game 6 had been going fantastic for the Cubs, they were up 3-0 in the eighth, only five outs away from breaking a 58-year world series absence streak. That is, until Steve Bartman tipped a foul ball away from left fielder’s Moises Alou’s glove.

The very moment Bartman’s hand touched the ball, his life would be changed forever. The New York Times reported that “by the end of the night, he was the most infamous fan, perhaps, in the history of American sports” (Strauss). After the game, he was escorted out by security, for his own safety. In the streets, people pointed and threw objects at him, chanting “asshole”.

But that was only the aggressive fans. Others interviewed later stated that “Batman was a small part of that fateful eighth inning… He didn’t cost us anything” (Strauss). The city was split down the middle, you either felt bad for Bartman, or wanted him banned from Wrigley Field. Those who empathized with Bartman felt that this was merely an overreaction to something that didn’t change much, he was just a scapegoat for all the unfortunate luck that the Cubs had endured for too long. He was welcomed with open arms to many, as most just wanted to end the

Although similar, the difference between Steve Bartman’s and Justine Sacco’s experience is the time period. In 2003, Twitter, Facebook, or even Instagram was widely used if it even existed. This dictated a drastic change in Bartman’s experience, as it was much easier for him to hide from the hate and threats. Justine Sacco, however, couldn’t hide from anyone. The readily available characteristics of social media in recent years left her nowhere to turn, nowhere to hide. Bartman, on the other hand, disappeared like a ghost.

Wired Magazine reports on the effect of social media and public shaming or even threatening. Laura Hudson writes, “social media has given a voice to the disenfranchised at its worst, it’s a weapon of mass reputation destruction”. Even seemingly small accounts with few followers or friends can have a large impact. It’s the network aspect of social media that allows word to travel like the plague, easily destroying someone’s reputation overnight. This ability cripples society’s ability to empathize, as it simply kills off any reason to empathize with the victim.

Many were able to empathize with Steve Bartman. How? The answer is quite simple: social media wasn’t popular enough back in 2003. Had this happened within recent years, he would have been torn apart by Cubs extremists. This is the effect that social media has upon empathy. No one wants to join the victims side, as they will also get attacked. Especially, the views of everybody else will shine no positive light on the victim, so why empathize with someone who seems like the worst person? Social media can change someone’s reputation so much that it makes them impossible to empathize with.

 

Works Cited:

Strauss, Ben. “Steve Bartman Remains Invisible, 10 Years Later.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 13 Oct. 2013. Web. 16 Oct. 2016.

Hudson, Laura. “Why You Should Think Twice Before Shaming Anyone on Social Media.” Wired.com. Conde Nast Digital, 24 July 2013. Web. 16 Oct. 2016.

11 thoughts on “Chasing a Ghost: Steve Bartman and the Cubs

  1. I really like your example because I think it talks about the effect of social media even before social media was huge and “widely used.” The backlash for Bartman seems like it was mostly through television and online articles. The year 2003 was not dominated by social media so the online effect for Bartman were less than if that happened today. I agree with your point because your argument is supported by my example with Anjali Ramkissoon. Her attack on the Uber driver happened in January of 2016 and it only became famous because the video of the episode was posted online. While thousands of people saw the Cubs game televised live, thousands of people saw Dr. Ramkissoon’s attack solely because of the internet. However, there were similar reactions from people online through articles and websites. With the distance between the victim and the attacker, people could easily not empathize and get away with it. You also said that no one wants to join the victim’s side on social media but there were some people in Anjali’s case who supported her online. The mixed comments on her Facebook post, for example, did have some extreme threats but some people did offer support. They show how it is possible for people to empathize over the Internet. I do agree, overall, with your argument that seeing another person’s mistake is easily attacked over social media, which can change someone’s life for the worse forever.

  2. e saw Dr. Ramkissoon’s attack solely because of the internet. However, there were similar reactions from people online through articles and websites. With the distance between the victim and the attacker, people could easily not em betting tips

  3. ms like it was mostly through television and online articles. The year 2003 was not dominated by social media so the online effect for Bartman were less than if that happened today. I agree with your point because your argument is supported by my example with Anjali Ramkissoon. Her attack on the Uber driver happened in January of 2016 and it only became famous because the video of the episode was posted online. While thousands of people saw av videoları

  4. WhatsApp 2019 APK for Android enables you not just to send out text in a conversation home window, however likewise to make video clip as well as voice ask for totally free. All messages traded by means of this app, consisting of data, voice, pictures, are secured with an end-to-end security. The exact same file encryption procedure is additionally utilized by Signal. Along with that, there is likewise the video clip telephone call function which allows you to link to an additional WhatsApp customer, either throughout a conversation or from the Calls display. Nevertheless, when it comes to currently, the group video clip calls function isn’t yet to be offered.

  5. Printer Epson L380 Series has successfully supported the world business and home users offers solutions print cost very low and can not be matched by other brands, while variants of the model are progressively growing with the performance and features continue to increase. Up now, printers with ink tank system has sold over two million units only for the entire world

  6. Smadav 2020 can cleanse your computer from virus assault either instantly or by hand. Smadav can likewise fix the computer registry that has actually been damaged or changed by infections. Smadav 2020 Latest Version can be mounted in Windows 10, Windows 8, Windows 7 as well as Windows XP

  7. All messages traded by means of this app, consisting of data, voice, pictures, are secured with an end-to-end security. The exact same file encryption procedure is additionally utilized by Signal. Along with that, there is likewise the video clip telephone paykwik Paykwik function which allows you to link to an additional WhatsApp customer, either Ucuz paykwik a conversation or from the Calls display. Nevertheless

  8. . I agree with your point because your argument is supported by my example with Anjali Ramkissoon. Her attack on the Uber driver happened in January of 2016 and it only became famous because the video of the episode was posted online. baknedio

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.